Legislative update
March 19, 2010
Hospital Rate Setting
NHHA and its members continue to be vocal about our opposition to SB 505
introduced by Senator Maggie Hassan (D-Exeter) to create a new state government
agency for rate setting for all community hospitals in New Hampshire. NHHA
President Steve Ahnen and Board Chairman Bruce King testified before the Senate
Commerce Committee last week. The media has taken great interest in SB 505 as
well, through news coverage and editorials. "Regulating Hospital Rates" was the
subject of NH Public Radio's The Exchange last week, featuring studio guests for
the hour, Steve Ahnen and Senator Hassan. The Union Leader and Concord Monitor
are among the newspapers which have published opinion pieces against the bill.
Later in the week the Commerce Committee authorized the following three
provisions to be included in an amended version of SB 505 that Senator Hassan
plans to introduce next week:
An amendment is not yet available, and despite a deadline to vote SB 505 out
of the Senate by March 10th, the vote has been delayed until March 24th. NHHA
remains opposed to any amendment that provides for a paid 3-member ‘PUC’-like
commission.
Proposal to Restore Medicaid Funds for Hospitals
NHHA provided testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in support of
Senator Kathy Sgambati's (D-Tilton) amendment to SB 489 to restore Medicaid
funding - $50 million - for a variety of health and social services programs
that were cut last month. SB 489 is Senator Lou D’Allesandro’s
(D-Manchester) attempt to introduce gaming in New Hampshire to raise new
revenues. NHHA asked to specifically dedicate a portion of gaming revenues to
restore hospital rates to the level they were at when the Legislature passed the
2010/2011 budget. In terms of State general funds, NHHA urged senators to
restore $2.5 million in FY 2010 and $10 million in FY 2011. By not restoring
these funds, New Hampshire stands to lose federal funds of $3.8 million in FY
2010 and $10.8 million in FY 2011. The Senate Finance Committee voted yesterday
to recommend passage of SB 489 including the Sgambati amendment.
More Medicaid Cuts to Come
Last month Governor Lynch announced a projected shortfall of $140 million in
state general funds through the end of fiscal year 2011 related to lagging
revenues, increased demand for state services and the Supreme Court’s decision
regarding the JUA. Since then state agency heads have submitted plans to the
governor’s office to reduce spending by 2 percent for the remainder of FY 2010
ending June 30, 2010 and by 8 percent for FY 2011. HHS Commissioner Nick Toumpas
reports his department’s proposed spending reductions will be $15 million in FY
2010 and $70 million in FY 2011.
The House Finance Committee voted unanimously this week on HB 1664 to recommend
budget cuts of approximately $47 million throughout state government. This is
part of the legislature’s efforts to balance the state budget, reported to be
$140 million in the red. Included in the cuts are Medicaid IME payments
($1.4 million general funds and $1.4 million federal funds and
catastrophic aid payments ($794,000 general funds and $1.2 million federal
funds) to hospitals in SFY 2011 (beginning July 1, 2010). The committee rejected
a proposal to cut outpatient payments to Critical Access Hospitals to 85% of
allowable costs - $2.8 million (state and federal funds).
DHHS proposed the same IME and catastrophic aid cuts approved by the legislative
Fiscal Committee last month. This week’s action would codify in statute the
February cuts and employs the term “suspension” versus “elimination” of payments
through June 30, 2011, thereby retaining these items on the books for the
future.
Health Costs
The Senate Commerce Committee has recommended an amended version of SB 392 for
passage “requiring public hearings concerning health care cost increases
in health care services”. SB 392 would allow the Insurance Commission to
“compel” health care providers and insurance carriers to provide information for
the purpose of studying health cost drivers and cost trends in New Hampshire.
Hospitals oppose SB 392. There is no rationale stated in the bill as to what
type of information hospitals and payers would be required to submit, and it
oversteps the Department of Health & Human Services’ authority to regulate
hospitals.
The fate of SB 392 rests on the outcome of SB 505 (see “Hospital Rate Setting”
above), as both bills seek to address health care cost drivers. Hospitals have
urged their senators to vote against passage of SB 392.
Privacy/Health Information
HB 1649, relative to health information and patient rights: The
House passed a much improved version of HB 1649 that stripped the more
restrictive consent requirements, with just the audit trail provisions remaining
in the bill. As amended, HB 1649 provides patients a means to check whether
someone they identify has had access to their electronic medical records during
a specified period within the previous three years. It requires medical
providers to examine any audit trail associated with the patient’s record and to
report whether the identified person had access or not and to what extent. This
is consistent with current practice at many New Hampshire hospitals. A hearing
on HB 1649 is scheduled for March 23 before the Senate HHS Committee.
Quality
HB 1169, deleting the repeal of the NH Health Care Quality Assurance
Commission: The House passed HB 1169 reauthorizing the NH Health Care
Quality Commission through 2015. HB 1169 would allow the Commission to continue
to bring hospitals and ASCs together to promote initiatives and share best
practices to enhance patient safety. The bill adds a governor-appointed
“member-at-large” to the Commission, and requires the Commission to report
annually to the Joint HHS Oversight Committee, in addition to legislative
leadership.
Other
A number of bills NHHA opposed have been killed including:
NHHA’s complete list of bills is available here.
2010 Legislative Updates:
Legislative Update Archive: