NHHA
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
March 14, 2006
Reporting of ‘Price’ Information
HB 1723, relative to health care and health insurance
data
The House has referred HB 1723 to “interim study” to be
worked on by the House Commerce Committee through the end of
the year. NHHA favors transparency, including the collection
and reporting of data that contributes to improving quality
of care, containing cost increases, and enhancing patients’
ability to make informed choices about their care. However,
proposals that were considered included (1) prohibiting
confidential business arrangements between providers and
insurers, despite antitrust laws that prohibit the sharing
of such information; and (2) collecting data that duplicates
current data systems managed by public and private
organizations engaged in health and insurance data
collection in the state. NHHA urged legislators to take into
account the unintended consequences of reporting mandates
including costly duplication. The additional time the
Committee has afforded itself to study HB 1723 should allow
for such consideration. NHHA will continue to work with
legislators as they examine this bill.
Rates Charged to the Uninsured
SB 378, relative to rates charged by health care
providers
The Senate killed a bill that would have required hospitals
and other health care providers to charge patients with
little or no health care coverage the median rates paid by
third party payers. In NHHA’s testimony, we described
several innovative programs adopted by New Hampshire’s
hospitals to assist patients with their health care costs.
These include the New Hampshire Medication Bridge Program in
which hospitals and other health care providers have
assisted more than 17,000 very low income persons to access
over $125 million worth of medications free of charge over
the past five years; the New Hampshire Health Access Network
(NHHAN), a privately sponsored statewide charity care
network serving tens of thousands of low income people; and
currently under development, a hospital discount program
that will provide discounts of 15% or more for patients
without coverage regardless of their financial status. Most
of New Hampshire’s hospitals already provide 100% discounts
to patients at or below 200% of the federal poverty level,
and several provide a 100% discount for people with incomes
up to 300% of the poverty threshold. In 2004, community
hospitals reported approximately $93 million in hospital
charges not collected for care provided as charity care, and
$144 million in hospital charges as bad debt.
Infection Reporting
HB 1741, relative to reporting requirements concerning
infections in hospitals
The House passed the infection reporting bill, which would
(1) require hospitals to report to DHHS all occurrences of
central line related bloodstream infections, ventilator
associated pneumonia and surgical wound infections, as well
as to report process measures including rates of flu
vaccinations; and (2) require DHHS to establish criteria,
standards and coding for tracking and reporting of
infections, as well as data collection and analytical
methodologies. The next stop for HB 1741 is the House
Finance Committee.
NHHA contends that any system designed to report infections
should provide meaningful and validated data, and therefore
recommends that the reporting of healthcare-associated
infection data be carried out in accordance with the
National Quality Forum’s (NQF) recommendations. The NQF
proposes to identify performance measures that provide
meaningful, publicly reported information to consumers,
purchasers, and providers about healthcare-associated
infections. Rather than risk implementation of incompatible
reporting systems around the nation, NHHA favors having New
Hampshire participate in the development of national
standards for reporting of healthcare-associated infection
data.
End of Life Care/Health Care Decision Making
HB 656, relative to medical decision making for those
adults without capacity to make health care decisions for
themselves
After two years of work on New Hampshire’s advance
directives laws (Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney
for Healthcare), a coalition of legislators and stakeholder
organizations were successful in convincing legislators to
update the State’s health care decisions statutes. This
important legislation – HB 656 – will: make it easier for
people to express in writing their preferences for health
care; bring NH’s current statute up to date; simplify into
plain English the legal language used in the current state
law to make it more understandable; and establish procedures
for ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders. Congratulations to the
Healthcare Decisions Coalition led by Shawn LaFrance and
many thanks to Representatives Maureen Mooney (R-Merrimack),
Cynthia Dokmo (R-Amherst), Hilda Sokul (D-Hanover), Laurie
Harding (D-Lebanon), Alida Millham (R-Gilford) and Robert
Rowe (R-Amherst) for their efforts to pass HB 656. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will take up HB 656 on March
28th.
Certificate of Need
SB 303, relative to elective angioplasty.
The Senate killed SB 303 designed to circumvent the
Certificate of Need process. If passed, the bill would have
prohibited the Health Services Planning & Review Board from
approving a specific procedure – elective angioplasty. NHHA
reminded senators that the Legislature has consistently
rejected initiatives in the past that attempt to circumvent
the CON process. Read NHHA’s testimony in opposition to this
effort to undermine the integrity of the CON program and
process.
Charitable Trusts
HB 1399, relative to the compensation paid to directors
or officers of a charitable trust
The House killed a bill that would have prohibited
“pecuniary benefit transactions” between a charitable
organization and members of its Board. But the real intent
of the bill’s sponsors was to limit the salaries of CEOs of
charitable organizations, and hospitals in particular.
Congress has dealt with this issue in 1996 with the passage
of the “Intermediate Sanctions” or Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2
(Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code). IRS regulations
govern executive compensation practices, placing
responsibility with the not-for-profit organization’s Board
of Trustees. A coalition of New Hampshire charitable
organizations worked with Charitable Trust Director Mike
DeLucia to kill this bill by informing legislators that New
Hampshire’s case law prohibits limiting compensation based
on a percentage, as proposed in the bill. Finally, New
Hampshire’s community benefit law contains “sunshine”
provisions that the Legislature has already established as
preferable to increased government regulation.
Purchasing Alliances
HB 515, relative to purchasing alliances
The Senate killed a bill that would have established a law
governing purchasing alliances which could be formed for the
purpose of purchasing health insurance. Carried over from
last session, the House had passed HB 515 before it sent it
to the Senate.
Other
HB 1555, establishing a commission to investigate cost
drivers in providing health care. The House passed HB
1555 which creates a 20-member commission, including two
hospital representatives, to study cost shifting associated
with providing services to Medicaid and uninsured patients;
hospital construction costs, medical malpractice insurance
rates, to name a few. HB 1555 is on its way to the Senate.
HB 1704, establishing a health care fund and requiring
certain employers to report certain information to the
department of health and human services.
The House killed the “Wal-Mart” bill intended to tax large
employers (more than 1500 employees) that do not provide
health coverage for their employees. The bill would have
determined how much an employer will spend on insurance, or
impose a health care tax
HB 1703, requiring certain employers to report on the
percentage of payroll which is being spent on health
insurance premiums for employees. This companion bill to
HB 1704 requiring employers with 500 or more employees to
report on how much they spend on health insurance has been
tabled by the House. While the Labor Committee voted (7-6)
to pass HB 1704 based on the desire to obtain cost shifting
information, there were others who feel that requiring such
information may be a violation of the State Constitution.
HB 1570, relative to health insurance coverage for
part-time college students.
The House passed HB 1570 to extend health insurance coverage
to dependent children under age 24 who are not covered under
the recently passed “Michelle’s Law” that allows college
students who take a medical leave of absence to be covered
under their parents’ family plan. While extend coverage to
part-time students, HB 1570 also allows coverage for
unmarried children under the age of 24 who are financially
dependent upon a parent and who either have the same legal
residence as the policyholder, or are full-time or part-time
students.
Go to
http://www.nhha.org/nhha/state_law/bills.php to view the
list of bills NHHA will be tracking in 2005-2006. Additional bills
will be added as we become aware of them.
2005 Legislative Updates:
Legislative Update Archive: